Lessons
  Menu

Understanding Participant Step in AEM

Create Task

The “Create Task” step is used to assign a task to a specific user or group within the workflow process. This step is particularly useful when human intervention or decision-making is required at a certain stage of the workflow.

Example Scenario: In a content approval workflow, after a blog post is authored, a “Create Task” step assigns the task of reviewing the content to a designated content manager. The content manager receives a notification to review the content and can either approve it for publishing or send it back for revisions.

Participant Step

The “Participant Step” allows the workflow to dynamically determine the participant (user or group) based on predefined conditions or rules. This step is beneficial when the participant’s identity depends on certain criteria within the workflow.

Example Scenario: In an e-commerce platform, when a customer places an order, the workflow uses a “Participant Step” to determine the appropriate customer service representative based on the product category. If the order includes electronics, it assigns the task to the electronics support team; if it’s clothing, it assigns it to the fashion support team.

Dialog Participant Step

Similar to the “Participant Step,” the “Dialog Participant Step” involves dynamic participant determination. However, it differs in that it allows users to interactively select participants through a dialog box during workflow execution.

Example Scenario: In a marketing campaign creation workflow, the “Dialog Participant Step” prompts the user initiating the workflow to select the target audience segment from a predefined list. The selected segment determines which marketing team members will be assigned tasks related to designing, reviewing, and deploying the campaign materials.

Dynamic Participant Step

The “Dynamic Participant Step” enables the workflow to dynamically determine participants based on external data sources or custom logic. This step is ideal for scenarios where participant selection relies on real-time or external factors.

Example Scenario: In a customer feedback processing workflow, the “Dynamic Participant Step” fetches the list of available customer support agents from an external CRM system. It then assigns the task of responding to customer feedback to the agent with the least workload or the agent assigned to the respective customer account.

Random Participant Chooser

As the name suggests, the “Random Participant Chooser” step randomly selects a participant from a predefined list of users or groups. This step adds an element of randomness to participant selection, useful in scenarios where any member of a group can perform a task.

Example Scenario: Within a content publishing workflow, a “Random Participant Chooser” step selects a member from the editorial team to perform a final quality check before content goes live. This ensures fairness and distribution of tasks among team members, preventing any single team member from being overloaded with review responsibilities.

Workflow Initiator Participant

The “Workflow Initiator Participant” step involves the workflow initiator as a participant. It allows the user who initiated the workflow to also participate in subsequent steps.

Example Scenario: In a document approval workflow, the “Workflow Initiator Participant” step involves the user who initiated the document creation process in subsequent steps. This allows the document creator to participate in the approval process by reviewing and approving their own work or providing additional context if required.

From Participant Step

The “From Participant Step” defines the participant based on the user who completed the previous step in the workflow. It is useful when the participant for the current step is related to the participant of the preceding step.

Example Scenario: In a multi-stage review workflow for marketing materials, the “From Participant Step” assigns the task of final approval to the user who performed the initial review. This ensures continuity and accountability throughout the review process, as the person familiar with the content from the initial review is responsible for the final decision.